Law Office of Mario Zapata - IMMIGRATION LAW
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Immigration Law
    • Executive Action >
      • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
      • Deferred Action for Parent Accountability (DAPA)
    • Family-Based Immigration >
      • Fiancee Visas
      • Green Card for Spouse, Children, and Siblings
      • Green Card Through Same-sex Marriage
      • I-601 & I-601A Provisional Waiver
      • U-Visa and Green Cards for Victims of Abuse (VAWA)
      • Naturalization & Citizenship
      • Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Military Members
    • Deportation Defense >
      • Asylum
      • Cancellation of Removal
      • Removal Proceedings
    • Employment-Based Immigration >
      • PERM & Employment-Based Green Card
      • E-1 and E-2 Non-immigrant Visa
      • H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers
      • L-1 Intra-company Transferee
      • TN (NAFTA Professionals)
  • Español
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • More +
    • Consultation
    • News
    • Resources
    • Scholarship
    • Disclaimer

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Publishes a Draft of its Guidance Policy Manual that Proposes Beneficial Changes to the Term "Extreme Hardship" When Adjudicating Form I-601 and Form I-601A Provisional Waivers

11/6/2015

8 Comments

 
Picture
Last month, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued draft guidance on what constitutes “extreme hardship” for purposes of an immigration waiver. The guidance is a component of the executive actions on immigration announced in November 2014. Many had hoped that the anticipated guidance could help remove obstacles to obtaining legal permanent status in the United States. The guidance a draft only and has not gone into effect. USCIS seeks public comments and feedback no later than November 23, 2015. Following review of the comments, USCIS will issue a final version.  To see the draft, please look below.

The immigration laws contain several waivers that allow noncitizens to overcome certain bars to admission (such as having unlawful presence in the United States) where certain family members (called “qualifying relatives”) would suffer “extreme hardship.” Unfortunately, immigration regulations do not define the term “extreme hardship.” As a result, USCIS has failed to apply the hardship standard consistently. In a November 20, 2014 memorandum, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson directed USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez to “clarify the factors that are considered by adjudicators in determining whether the ‘extreme hardship’ standard has been met.” In issuing such a directive, his intent was clear: “It is my assessment that additional guidance about the meaning of the phrase ‘extreme hardship’ would provide broader use of this legally permitted waiver.”

Whether the final guidance will achieve the goal of “broader use” of the waiver remains to be seen. The draft guidance, in many ways, does not veer far from current guidance, albeit limited, that the immigration courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals have provided over the years. It also seems to add unexpected detail and layers of analysis, calling into question whether implementation will be difficult and the Secretary’s goal less obtainable.

Individuals applying for a waiver today must show that there would be extreme hardship to the qualifying relative if the family were separated (i.e., the relative remained in the United States) AND if the family member relocated outside the United States. Importantly, the draft guidance does not require the applicant to show hardship in both circumstances. Rather, if the applicant can pass a threshold finding that it is “reasonably foreseeable” that the qualifying relative would either remain in the United States OR relocate abroad, he or she need not demonstrate hardship in both situations.

One place where the guidance falls short is that it fails to include a list of situations where a presumption of extreme hardship exists, i.e., certain situations that automatically would result in a finding of hardship. The November 20 Johnson memo actually directed “USCIS to consider criteria by which a presumption of extreme hardship may be determined to exist.” As the Secretary pointed out, such presumptions exist in other immigration policies. Instead, the draft guidance offered the term “special circumstances”—circumstances that “would often weigh heavily in favor of finding extreme hardship.” These special circumstances include where the qualifying relative has been granted asylum or refugee status, is disabled, or is on active military duty; where the State Department has issued a travel warning to a country of relocation; and where there is a substantial change regarding the ability to provide care of an applicant’s children.

USCIS made a good decision to publicly release the draft guidance for public comment. This is an opportunity for stakeholders to carefully review the detailed guidance and make recommendations that will help the agency to fulfill its promise of waivers that are more broadly available. Once the guidance is finalized, it will be crucial to monitor how it is implemented in the field, as that will be the true test of its success.

Call our office if you need help with Form I-601 Waiver and/or Form I-601A Provisional Waiver.  Our office will inform you of such updates and assist you through the process.

8 Comments

    Author

    Mario Zapata is an immigration attorney practicing out of Orange County, CA and represents clients nationwide.

    Archives

    February 2018
    August 2017
    November 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    Categories

    All
    AB 60
    Adjustment Of Status
    Advance Parole
    Child Status Protection Act
    Cross-Chargeability
    Cspa
    DACA
    DAPA
    Deferred Action For Parent Accountability
    Domestic Violence
    Executive Action
    Green Card
    I-601
    Immigrant Visa
    Provisional Waiver
    Removal
    Sought To Acquire
    TPS
    U-Visa
    Victims Of Crime

    RSS Feed

Based in Anaheim, California, the Law Office of Mario Zapata provides immigration-related legal services to individual and business clients from across the United States and around the world, including: Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino, and San Diego County in California. Mr. Zapata has represented residents of Anaheim, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, La Habra, Lake Forest, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Ontario, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Juan Capistrano, and Westminster.

© 2018 by Law Office of Mario Zapata. All rights reserved. Disclaimer :  Site Map
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Immigration Law
    • Executive Action >
      • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
      • Deferred Action for Parent Accountability (DAPA)
    • Family-Based Immigration >
      • Fiancee Visas
      • Green Card for Spouse, Children, and Siblings
      • Green Card Through Same-sex Marriage
      • I-601 & I-601A Provisional Waiver
      • U-Visa and Green Cards for Victims of Abuse (VAWA)
      • Naturalization & Citizenship
      • Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Military Members
    • Deportation Defense >
      • Asylum
      • Cancellation of Removal
      • Removal Proceedings
    • Employment-Based Immigration >
      • PERM & Employment-Based Green Card
      • E-1 and E-2 Non-immigrant Visa
      • H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers
      • L-1 Intra-company Transferee
      • TN (NAFTA Professionals)
  • Español
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • More +
    • Consultation
    • News
    • Resources
    • Scholarship
    • Disclaimer