United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Publishes a Draft of its Guidance Policy Manual that Proposes Beneficial Changes to the Term "Extreme Hardship" When Adjudicating Form I-601 and Form I-601A Provisional Waivers
Last month, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued draft guidance on what constitutes “extreme hardship” for purposes of an immigration waiver. The guidance is a component of the executive actions on immigration announced in November 2014. Many had hoped that the anticipated guidance could help remove obstacles to obtaining legal permanent status in the United States. The guidance a draft only and has not gone into effect. USCIS seeks public comments and feedback no later than November 23, 2015. Following review of the comments, USCIS will issue a final version. To see the draft, please look below.
The immigration laws contain several waivers that allow noncitizens to overcome certain bars to admission (such as having unlawful presence in the United States) where certain family members (called “qualifying relatives”) would suffer “extreme hardship.” Unfortunately, immigration regulations do not define the term “extreme hardship.” As a result, USCIS has failed to apply the hardship standard consistently. In a November 20, 2014 memorandum, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson directed USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez to “clarify the factors that are considered by adjudicators in determining whether the ‘extreme hardship’ standard has been met.” In issuing such a directive, his intent was clear: “It is my assessment that additional guidance about the meaning of the phrase ‘extreme hardship’ would provide broader use of this legally permitted waiver.”
Whether the final guidance will achieve the goal of “broader use” of the waiver remains to be seen. The draft guidance, in many ways, does not veer far from current guidance, albeit limited, that the immigration courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals have provided over the years. It also seems to add unexpected detail and layers of analysis, calling into question whether implementation will be difficult and the Secretary’s goal less obtainable.
Individuals applying for a waiver today must show that there would be extreme hardship to the qualifying relative if the family were separated (i.e., the relative remained in the United States) AND if the family member relocated outside the United States. Importantly, the draft guidance does not require the applicant to show hardship in both circumstances. Rather, if the applicant can pass a threshold finding that it is “reasonably foreseeable” that the qualifying relative would either remain in the United States OR relocate abroad, he or she need not demonstrate hardship in both situations.
One place where the guidance falls short is that it fails to include a list of situations where a presumption of extreme hardship exists, i.e., certain situations that automatically would result in a finding of hardship. The November 20 Johnson memo actually directed “USCIS to consider criteria by which a presumption of extreme hardship may be determined to exist.” As the Secretary pointed out, such presumptions exist in other immigration policies. Instead, the draft guidance offered the term “special circumstances”—circumstances that “would often weigh heavily in favor of finding extreme hardship.” These special circumstances include where the qualifying relative has been granted asylum or refugee status, is disabled, or is on active military duty; where the State Department has issued a travel warning to a country of relocation; and where there is a substantial change regarding the ability to provide care of an applicant’s children.
USCIS made a good decision to publicly release the draft guidance for public comment. This is an opportunity for stakeholders to carefully review the detailed guidance and make recommendations that will help the agency to fulfill its promise of waivers that are more broadly available. Once the guidance is finalized, it will be crucial to monitor how it is implemented in the field, as that will be the true test of its success.
Call our office if you need help with Form I-601 Waiver and/or Form I-601A Provisional Waiver. Our office will inform you of such updates and assist you through the process.
3/8/2022 03:08:19 pm
I like that you said that you will have a bigger chance if your reason to live here is reasonable. A friend of mine mentioned to me that he and his partner are planning to buy a home here and settle, and he asked me if I have any idea what is the best option to do in obtaining a permanent residency. Thanks to this informative article and I'll be sure to tell him that consulting a green card service can help him with all the documents needed.
4/20/2022 12:37:08 am
It was good content and very useful for all. Thanks for sharing.
6/25/2022 11:52:03 am
These special circumstances include where the qualifying relative has been granted asylum or refugee status is disabled or is on active military duty; Thank you, amazing post!
6/25/2022 12:29:56 pm
Importantly the draft guidance does not require the applicant to show hardship in both circumstances. Thank you for the beautiful post!
7/22/2022 04:19:37 am
Good blog post !!Your work was very impressive; I really appreciate the research part of it which made your article very rich and understandable. Overall you have done a great work.
11/5/2022 01:31:30 am
It also seems to add unexpected detail and layers of analysis, calling into question whether implementation will be difficult and the Secretary’s goal less obtainable. Thank you for the beautiful post!
I never took into account the fact that there are additional details and layers of analysis in the process that would have to be implemented. In that case, family immigration lawyers should be hired when you are in this kind of situation. With the experts' help, I believe that an individual will be able to get their citizenship sooner than they have ever expected.
4/4/2023 12:05:52 am
I appreciate that you explained that hiring a legal consultant could provide appropriate guidance for your immigration needs. The other day, my friend from work told me he was hoping to have a consultation with an immigration lawyer to help him and his wife for migrating here to settle a family. He asked if I had thoughts on the best option to consider. I love this helpful migrating article. I'll tell him it will be much better if he consults a trusted immigration law firm as they can help with the legal process.
Leave a Reply.
Mario Zapata is an immigration attorney practicing out of Orange County, CA and represents clients nationwide.